Senior Member
|
This is a great looking chair, from the side anyways  , Is the number truly burned in or is it a black stencil? I'm going to venture a guess it might be a Stickley Brothers chair. The early Stickley Brothers catalogs have a model 641 that has the same double through tenons and no corbel style but not the extreme lean. The later 1912 catalog has a model 741 that has the exact look except for added stubby corbels. Unfortunately all these pictures have back cushions that block the slats so we don't know how many. However, a price guide by Warman's has a chair that looks pretty much exactly the same and has the 5 back slats, but it labels it as S Bros model 604 but with a question mark, and dates it 1912-15. This model number isn't in either of the 1912 or 14 books. Putting the pieces together, it might be the 641 model, with a style change, from the gap in the catalogs between 1908 and 1912, with a model number change by 1912 or conversely a dropped model 641 by this point. Can you confirm some dimensions? Hieght, width, depth? Value, assuming it is Stickley Brothers, finish looks original and a little worn, assuming no repairs or big faults, cushions replaced, I would say similar to the Warman's book at $1800-2200.
|
| |
|
Full Member
|
I think your right stonecat...stickley bros for sure. I've seen morris chairs with the lean in the lower seat boards instead of just in the arms. Which in a rocker you wouldn't hardly notice because of the natural lean back. And as you know it's so hard to go strictly from the books because of all the un-catalouged variations they made. It's very easy to have different corbels, or the lack of thru tenon's or pegged versus not pegged. But I concur, I think you right on with this one.
|
| |
|
Senior Member
|
I like the lean, sort of like sitting back on a chopper with big wide bars, not that I've actually done that. There was a leaner Limbert on eBay a while ago but alas it blew past my bids.
|
| |
|